Monday, July 11, 2005

A changed mind who wants to change minds: Duong Thu Huong

In today's NY Times (registration only, of course) there is a book review featuring a Vietnamese novelist who is new to me, Duong Thu Huong .

Huong, 58, is an excellent example of a changed mind, not to mention a courage and outspokenness that reminds me quite a bit of Oriana Fallaci:

In 1994, through the intervention of Danielle Mitterrand, France's first lady at that time, Ms. Huong was allowed to come to France to receive an award. She was offered political asylum. "I said, 'Thank you, but in my country fear crushes everything, brave soldiers have become cowardly civilians,' " she recalled. " 'That's why I have to return. I return to do one thing: to spit in the face of the regime.' "

Here's a summary of Ms. Huong's activities:

Her sins, it seems, are many. Her novels dissecting life under one of the last Communist regimes are published and well received in the West. She is a former Communist Party member who was expelled as a traitor. And above all, she is a dissident - a "dissident whore," one party leader said - who refused to be silenced even after spending eight months in prison in 1991...her priority is to denounce the Hanoi government as irremediably corrupt and abusive...

"It is my mission to do so on behalf of those who have died under this shameful regime," she said, speaking fluent but heavily accented French. "Because I have a small reputation abroad, I have to say these things. I have to empty what is inside me to feel my conscience is clear. The people have lost the power to react, to reflect, to think. Perhaps I will give people courage."

It's the changed-mind aspect of her story that especially interests me. Huong was born in North Vietnam and indoctrinated as a child in the party line. She became an actress during the late 60s, and went to entertain the troops:

"I joined a group of young artists performing for the troops and victims of the war. The slogan was: 'Our songs are louder than the bombing.' We would silence the screams with songs."

But even then, she recalled, she noticed that party members enjoyed special privileges. A bigger shock followed when South Vietnamese prisoners arrived in her zone. "I discovered the truth that we were also fighting Vietnamese," she said. "Yes, we were being bombed all the time by the Americans, but they were high in the sky and I never saw them. I only saw Vietnamese."

She kept her thoughts to herself, as she did after the war when she met up with relatives in Ho Chi Minh City (as Saigon was renamed) and realized that the defeated were better off than the victors.


Ms. Huong later was privy to some revisionist history on the part of the North Vietnamese, which fed her disillusionment:

One freelance job proved to be another eye-opener. Working for a group of army generals, she ghost wrote a history of the Vietnam War. "The generals would discuss among themselves how to correct my text to suit their interests," she said. "They wanted to increase the number of Vietnamese who died to show that no sacrifice was too great for the people."

After one of her novels was published in the 80s and became a source of some controversy for the Party:

"The party's general secretary, Nguyen Van Linh, offered me a house of the kind reserved for ministers if I would remain silent," she said. "I told him, 'I fight for democracy, I place myself on the side of the people and would never agree to be like a minister.' My principle is that you can lose everything, even your life, but never your honor."

That last sentence is the key to the attitude that propels people such as Huong (and Fallaci, by the way) to take the risks they do. When faced with experiences and personal observations that contradicted her early indoctrination, she chose to jettison the belief system in which she had been raised, and to fight it with all her considerable powers of expression. Her sense of personal honor required such a course of action.

12 Comments:

At 8:48 AM, July 11, 2005, Blogger goesh said...

What courage!

 
At 12:20 PM, July 11, 2005, Blogger VietPundit said...

neo,

Another dissident Vietnamese writer you might want to check out is Nguyen Huy Thiep. Another changed mind is Colonel Bui Tin. Unlike Berkeley, Hanoi has many changed minds. I will write about this topic later.

 
At 1:04 AM, July 12, 2005, Blogger Dreamer said...

Incredible! Did she author her book in the west, then? Wouldn't it be great to trojan horse it into the Chinese nets?

 
At 8:22 AM, July 12, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Excuse me, this is also the same everywhere. In fact, if Vietnam had inavaded and ruled America for 80 years, I would like to see what we would to our fellow countrymen who collaborated with the enemy. I'd bet a far uglier scenario then what played out in Vietnam after
their war."

Well, that raises an interesting question. What should we do with your kind? After all, you are proud of ridiculing and rejecting your own country.

 
At 10:33 AM, July 12, 2005, Blogger goesh said...

starvation in north korea, abject poverty in cuba, stagnation and heresy in north viet nam - where are the marxists when ya' most need a diatribe against elected government and capitalism and competition?

 
At 11:08 AM, July 12, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No doubt things would have gone much better for them if, through the last century, the Vietnamese would have just rolled over and played dead to western interests,

Yes, that's exactly what I would maintain. I'm married to a refugee from SE Asia--one of the countless refugees that John Kerry, George McGovern, and Noam Chomsky said wouldn't exist. I like the rhetorical identification of the Communists with "the Vietnamese" though...very typical. Learn that in freshman comp last year?

Do you know the first thing the NVA did when they got into power? Liquidated the remains of the Viet Cong. The second thing was set up concentration camps for their domestic enemies, of which they had an enormous number for a "popular resistance party." I'm sure none of this bothers you, because the evil colonialists were gone...along with millions of others who fled the regimes you would never want to live under.

 
At 2:33 PM, July 12, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Minh--

"Ho" is just upset that he can't send you to a re-education camp.

 
At 7:09 PM, July 12, 2005, Blogger Huan said...

being Vietnamese of Northern descent i have to laugh at the notion that the US invaded and occupied Vietnam, that the war was somehow anything other than a civil war between two ideologies receiving support internationally. i laugh because obvious some would rather cling in ignorance to well worn lies and propaganda than the pursue the truth apart from media reports and hearsays.

on second thought, i think it sad to prefer such ignorance over truth.

oh well. to each his own poison.

 
At 7:50 AM, July 13, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ho--

You did know that the real Ho spent the 1920s writing propaganda in the Soviet Union, right? It was absolutely indistinguishable from what you wrote, actually. Is there any North Korea propaganda point you haven't rehashed?

What WOULD the South have done if they'd won the war?

Since they weren't interested in conquering the north, it probably would have been Thailand or South Korea or Taiwan. Please compare these countries to, let us say, Laos. You may have been to a tourist trap or two in SE Asia--I rather doubt it--but you don't know a goddamn thing about any of these places. It would have been infinitely better to "roll over for Western interests" (usual Red-fascist allegation against those who don't want to live in a prison state) than be Vietnam in the 80s.

Funny you should bring up Indonesia. You do know that the cause-celebre of the Left in the 70s and 80s was East Timor (or, probably, you don't). Bin Laden cited East Timor's independence as a Western imperialist plot--after the Bali bombers repeated the point during their "trial," John Pilger wailed "it just can't be". Ah, but it was, wasn't it? All this is down the memory hole for the Lefties now, along with their support for an independent Kurdistan.

And I imagine if I stood on a corner today and started raving about all the things the US has done to the Middle East (and other countries like yours) the last 50 years, to radicalise Arabs, or that perhaps we deserved to get bombed, I bet I would get picked up too.

You mean like Michael Moore, Ward Churchill, Edward Said, Noam Chomsky, Bill Moyers, Tariq Ali, Nicholas de Genova, Michael Scheuer, Juan Cole...isn't more likely you'd get tenure, a book contract, or a seat next to Jimmy Carter at the next Democratic convention? But really, this is a matter for your shrink, whom I advise you see immediately.

People who think command economies work really ought not talk about being educated.

 
At 8:57 AM, July 13, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Minh--

I assure you "Ho" doesn't know and doesn't care. White middle-class leftists dream that Cuba is a paradise (look at those (unaudited) mortality figures! look at the free (nonexistent) health care!) and that they're "courageous" for saying something that you can read in any Barnes and Noble in the country, or hear on taxpayer-supported NPR or a state-run university any day of the week. Pathetic, isn't it?

 
At 10:36 AM, July 13, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ho--

I was getting concerned that you had been picked up by a death squad for exercising your freedom of speech.

I realize that your Chomskyite understanding of economics holds you back, as your praise of the Great Leap Forward (I didn't realize that the US was "bombing" China in the 50s) so amply demonstrates. By the way, the current Leftist line is that China isn't communist any more (and they're right for once...I guess it would be too much to ask what experience you've had working with the Chinese). Do try to keep up.

The Viet Cong were the ALLIES of the North. Please explain why they needed liquidation. You can also describe the current success of the Israeli kibbutz, and why it barely exists anymore despite decades of welfare support; the only bombing that's been done to it has been by the Arabs. Is that what you meant by bombing?

I am pleased to agree with you that the agricultural price support systems of the west are shameful. If you think they "work pretty well" (by which I mean "are self-supporting"), it's clear your medicine hasn't quite taken. Increase your dosage.

Of course you don't believe that the Bali bombing had anything to do with East Timor--it's only the people who carried it out who said that it was. But they're brown and didn't parrot your propaganda points, so like Minh they don't count. Hey, you haven't even called Minh a "gusano" yet!

I only say we would have treated them worse.

Any actual evidence? I didn't think so. What we do have is the evidence of Laos, Cambodia, North Korea and Vietnam--much worse than Thailand, Taiwan, and South Korea. Which way did the refugees go again?

 
At 3:06 PM, March 29, 2006, Blogger Faith said...

I am going to spend about 5 weeks in and around Vietnam this summer and would like very much to interview Duong Thu Huong. Do you have any idea how I can get in touch with her? I do not speak Vietnamese and would need a translator, but I surmise I could find one in Hanoi.

Thank you.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


Powered by Blogger