More from Radical Son
I've just finished Radical Son. Those who recommended it to me were correct; it's a fascinating account of one of the biggest political "changers" of recent times. David Horowitz was way to the left of me in his "before" shot, but we seem to have ended up somewhat in the same place now.
Horowitz's book is filled with quotable quotes. From time to time I will post a few. Here he is in 1986, addressing a pro-Sandinista crowd at Berkeley (in the belly of the beast, as it were):
Twenty-five years ago, as one of the founders of the New Left, I was an organizer of the first political demonstrations on this Berkeley campus--and indeed on any campus--to protest our government's anti-Communist policies in Cuba and Vietnam. Tonight I come before you as a man I used to tell myself I would never be: a supporter of President Reagan, a committed opponent of Communist rule in Nicaragua.
I make no apologies for my present position. It was what I thought was the humanity of the Marxist idea that made me what I was then; it is the inhumanity of what I have seen to be the Marxist reality that has made me what I am now. If my former colleagues who support the Sandinista cause were to pause for a moment and then plunge their busy political minds into the human legacies of their activist pasts, they would instantly drown in an ocean of blood.
When confronted by a reality he couldn't deny, Horowitz refused to retreat into the world of pretty ideas. He finally faced up to the reality of the carnage created by Communism (and enabled by its "useful idiots" on the left) during the course of the 20th century, from Stalin's murders to Vietnam and Cambodia after the US pullout. History proved him right on the Sandinistas, too, although I wonder how many in that Berkeley crowd ended up taking note of that fact.
"They would instantly drown in an ocean of blood"...yes. Horowitz didn't pull his punches when he spoke for the left, and he certainly doesn't do so now that he's on the right. That, at least, has not changed.
posted by neo-neocon @ 12:05 PM
5 comments
5 Comments:
You mean "Radical Son" don't you? I am reading it myself at the recommendation of my wife's cousin, who came around many years before I did (I am a "9-11 Republican"). I just got past the slower earlier parts, and am into the (to me) more interesting parts.
Yes, Radical Son of course, I will change it (well, it's about change, after all, isn't it?).
It's funny--I've made that error twice now, enough to conclude that the wires in my brain are crossed up on this topic. I seem to have morphed David Horowitz into Richard Wright, which would be quite an accomplishment. Wright, by the way, I've also in the past crossed up at times with poet Richard Wilbur.
I guess that's what happens when you read too much, and you get old--the files get rather full :-).
I'm 1/4 of the way through Radical Son and reading it on your recommendation, n-nc.
Reality always looks worse in the comparison of an idea, and its ideal result, against a reality based on the alternate idea.
Most Bush-bashers are even worse -- they have an unstated Unreal Perfection as the alternative.
They call it "higher standard", but it means they can justify Bush-hate by any and every imperfection.
Do you have any possible futures that could change your mind, back?
Like, if the terrorists in Iraq are successful at killing 10 000 more Iraqis in the next year?
Or 100 000?
(I would favor more agressive action at about 5 000, and increasingly agressive Iraqi state action.)
I too enjoyed Horowitz's book, although I can't help feeling that although his political beliefs have changed, his style of political campaigning hasn't, nor his intense determination that everyone has to agree with whatever position he has adopted at any given time. With him I see a change in ideological content, but scarcely behaviour.
Post a Comment
<< Home